🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.